Perhaps no one has :grokked" the difference is because either there isn't one or because it is so poorly explained and discussed as to be non-existent. This sounds like more marketing hype perpetrated by individuals that know buzzwords and little else.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 6:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Modernize Mainframe Applications for Hybrid Cloud with IBM and AWS Thanks. I’ve seen something similar on the ACM https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/1476793.1476796 > On 20 Jun 2022, at 8:51 pm, Joe Monk <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19690000381 > > Joe > >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 7:00 AM David Crayford <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> And yet still nobody seems to have grokked the fundamental >> differences between online systems and event-driven architectures. >> This is obviously not the forum for discussions on contemporary >> software architectures. It always deteriorates into a deluge of >> boring and undiscerningposts about how it's nothing new and was >> already done back in the day on a S360 with 4K ram and a paper-taper reader >> held together with gaffer tape. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event-driven_architecture >> >>> On 20/06/2022 7:40 pm, Seymour J Metz wrote: >>> Before MQ there were QTAM and TCAM. >> <groan> >>> >>> There have been mainframes running real time applications since the >> 1960s. Air traffic control. Airline reservations. Controlling traffic >> lights (UNIVAC, not IBM.) These may not be the best examples, but >> they were the first to come to mind, and used off the shelf mainframes. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on >> behalf of René Jansen [[email protected]] >>> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 5:50 AM >>> To:[email protected] >>> Subject: Re: Modernize Mainframe Applications for Hybrid Cloud with >>> IBM >> and AWS >>> >>> You can make that 'about 30 years ago' - time flies while we’re >>> having >> fun. >>> >>> René. >>> >>>> On 20 Jun 2022, at 09:51, Colin Paice<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> MQ from IBM developed about 20+ years ago helped get from Batch to real >>>> time. You put messages to a queue, and it can run IMS transactions >>>> (including OTMA), CICS transactions, or even batch!. You can put >>>> on >> one >>>> member in a sysplex and get in another member. >>>> It has single put, and also publish/subscribe capability. >>>> >>>> Colin >>>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email [email protected] with the message: INFO >>> IBM-MAIN >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email [email protected] with the message: INFO >>> IBM-MAIN >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO >> IBM-MAIN >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
