In <[email protected]>, on 04/07/2013
at 02:55 PM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> said:
>BASIC and FORTRAN both used sequence numbers as "labels" but they
>were on the left, not the right, correct?
Those weren't sequence numbers, and sequence numbers are only on the
right for FB.
>Speaking of not portable program formats, didn't Symbolic Optimal
>Assembly Program (SOAP) optimize code speed by scattering
>instructions around a drum such that the next instruction to be
>executed was just coming under the read head?
Do you know of any 650 assembler that didn't?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
