I don't think that instream data for a PROC started via SUB=MSTR will ever occur. The reason is that instream data is kept in the SPOOL. And there is no SPOOL associated with SUB=MSTR. This is the same reason that there is no support for SYSOUT= in a SUB=MSTR environment.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Gibney, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of Tom Marchant >> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 1:04 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?) >> >> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:56:09 +0000, Gibney, Dave wrote: >> >> >I would hope converter/interpreter. If not, then instream substitution would >> not be available for Started Tasks. >> >> I'm not sure what yo mean by this. If you mean for started tasks that run >> SUB=MSTR, then instream data sets are not available, are they? > > As I said, I haven't read the announcement detail. And I still haven't. But, > further think leads me to realize that instream data is a JESx thing, and the > support for instream data for PROCs may be limited to JESx, and my concern is > therefore moot. > > But, I can see where instream data to PROCs submitted via MSTR could be a > useful feature. > -- This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
