I'm concerned with the SMP side of things; as long as a PTF is correctly flagged as PE, I don't care about the APAR unless there is a reason to bypass.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Dave Jousma [000001a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2023 9:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: How to determine if Enhanced HOLDDATA received? On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 14:30:38 +0000, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: >Doesn't the process for security/integrity violations include creating an >APAR? If so, shouldn't any PTF with hold class SECINT also have an ERROR hold >with the relevant APAR number? > > >-- >Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > APARS are created, but for customers, APARS associated with a SECINT flagged PTF result in “Document not found” when following the links. IBM doesn’t publish the APAR’s associated with SECINT fixes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
