On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:54:41 -0700, John Norgauer wrote:

>Have any of you sysprogs ever had to look at a SUP'ed PTF?
>
>Reason for the question is the following. Recently I put on a monstrous
>PTF with almost  2.7 meg records. This huge PTF sup'ed
>another PTF that was about the same size. We have had to added SMPPTS1 and
>SMPPTS2 to accommodate the PTF's
>
>Don't you think  IBM  should reject a PTF from the PTS that has been
>SUP'ed?
>
>Does IBM have reasons for keeping the SUP'ed PTF's
>
>What say you folks about this?
> 
I believe you can just delete it from the SMPPTS and SMP/E will
hardly know the difference.  Sooner or later you can do an ACCEPT PURGE.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to