In
<of5cc65b38.691fdc09-on88257b58.0052d641-88257b58.007dd...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu>,
on 04/25/2013
at 03:54 PM, John Norgauer <[email protected]> said:
>Don't you think IBM should reject a PTF from the PTS that has been
>SUP'ed?
Not if your options prohibit it. You can always REJECT it yourself.
Certainly not if you're talking about the MCS rather than the staus in
a target zone.
>Does IBM have reasons for keeping the SUP'ed PTF's
Yes.
>What say you folks about this?
You might be able to make a business case for an option to
automatically exclude from RECEIVE anything that is accepted in *all*
target zones.
If your concern is for a PTF that has not yet been applied, I can
think of no case in which a would want a superceding PTF to
automatically reject it on receive.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
