Thank you .. I'll pass that on. It has gone very quiet with the person I was working with. I hope they are looking into this. Colin
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 17:17, Jack Zukt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > Using the UNIXPRIV class and the BPX profiles in the FACILITY class has > enabled me to avoid giving a lot of must have UID(0) over the years. It may > take a little longer that giving UID(0), as you will have to work through a > few (or a lot) of ICH408I, but it is doable. > Regards, > Jack > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 at 20:06, Colin Paice <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I've been reviewing someone's (ftp like) product documentation, and they > > say that the userid that runs their product needs id(0) to be able to > run. > > This feels like giving too much authority to the userid. Is there a > better > > way of defining the userid and its access to resources to be able to > > eliminate the need for id(0)? > > Colin > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
