To be clear, that might be IBM's response, but it is certainly not individual IBMers' response. I, for one, appreciate feedback on the ICSF publications. I have personally taken over 20 updates from fine folks like you for our publications.
Eric Rossman -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 9:40 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Are you serious about wanting a better IBM doc RCF-type process? I find it kind of amazing. Here is a bunch of dedicated people, many of us with 40 or more years of experience, willing to help IBM make their documentation better AT NO CHARGE TO IBM. And what is IBM's response? Take a hike. You know, there are many things that have made this platform successful over the years. Certainly, high on the list are the business and the engineering or technical features. But also there is the thoroughness and accuracy of the documentation, and the enthusiastic user community. IBM might want to think twice before messing with the goose that laid the golden egg. Charles ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
