Sorry, I'm a bit late to this, this morning.

But "...neither as available, functional ore reliable as those they replace" has been an ongoing complaint going back a few decades. And definitely deserves a *+1 *from me.

But I'm afraid that you are talking to this chap: Brick Wall, please allow me to introduce you to the users of the Tech Library. These are the people that keep z/OS (and others) running on hardware your employer develops and sells.

Steve Thompson


On 5/24/2023 10:49 AM, Art Gutowski wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2023 12:40:34 +0000, Allan Staller <[email protected]> wrote:

Classification: Confidential

This entire thread comes down to "the "new tools" are neither as available, 
functional ore reliable as those they replace".

I was hoping you'd say that.

+1 on RCFs and +1 on the above.

Art Gutowski

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
Regards,
Steve Thompson
VS Strategies LLC
Westfield IN
972-983-9430 cell

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to