On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 09:02:39 PM PDT, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > I've found SCAN to be almost worthless. It doesn't always report invalid > data set names.
I don't think that David cares about the value of TYPERUN=SCAN to you. If he uses it to solve his problem, then it is of great value to him. > Is there a JES data set accessible by SDSF that shows symbols resolved? Someone with z/OS access can quickly verify. I believe it's just after JESJOBLG which shows everything including proc expansion and I believe variable substitution. > what does it show if symbol resolution extends a line beyond column 71? Someone with z/OS access can quickly verify. Create an inline proc that has a variable with 20 or so characters and a DD where the DSN=&VAR..JUNK starts in column 55. > In fact, any continuation that splits a data set name can be "a little funky > to process." This would not be my first choice but it's a solution that meets David's requirements of being processed by REXX and being free. If he understands the pattern, then he can program for it.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
