On Wed, 8 May 2013 08:37:12 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote:
>
>They might have simply put their 'control's in the wrong exits (TSO) and
>were too lazy to refit them into the (JES and SMF) exits where they
>belonged.
>
A plausible motivation is that they want all jobs submitted via their scheduler.
On Tue, 7 May 2013 13:34:07 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
>
>I once installed a package at a hush-hush installation (program needed
>configuration data, then submitted assembly/link jobs) and was told it
>wouldn't work because they prohibited TSO job submission. They were
>surprised when my jobs started running. Next time I talked to them,
>they had modified JES2 so that internal reader allocation went to class
>B (punch) instead!
>
Does the class matter? If I allocate:
//SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=(B,INTRDR)
... will the job not run? Will the punch writer contend with INTRDR?
(You mean they had a punch?)
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
