On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 13:46:25 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote: > >This is not meant to be snide, just a citation of sorts: these behaviors were >discussed long ago when Rexx was introduced to VM/CMS, are established canon. >(Is that redundant? Can there be UNestablished canon?) > I used to know that. Perhaps I saw it in the (CMS?) Ref. That has gotten thicker and harder to search. I see no information about storage in: <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=instructions-drop>
And I once considered writing an asynchronous ATTACH and find no description of whether REXX storage compaction is likely to move storage addressed by IRXEXCOM. I use SYSCALL SPAWN instead. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
