Lionel, Does the storage not dropped create a problem? Or is this just a thing you want cleaned up?
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 4:02 AM Paul Gilmartin < 0000042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 13:46:25 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote: > > > >This is not meant to be snide, just a citation of sorts: these behaviors > were discussed long ago when Rexx was introduced to VM/CMS, are established > canon. (Is that redundant? Can there be UNestablished canon?) > > > I used to know that. Perhaps I saw it in the (CMS?) Ref. That has gotten > thicker and harder to search. I see no information about storage in: > <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=instructions-drop> > > And I once considered writing an asynchronous ATTACH and find no > description of whether REXX storage compaction is likely to move > storage addressed by IRXEXCOM. I use SYSCALL SPAWN instead. > > -- > gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Wayne V. Bickerdike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
