Well, SABRE has been moving off the mainframe since 2001.

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 3:27 PM Dean Kent <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I didn't want to get into the firefight... however, the commentary here
> encouraged me to do so.
>
> My own belief (whether founded or not) is that if you follow your
> passion and become good at it, someone will recognize that and feel it
> is valuable enough to pay for it.   I also believe that specialists tend
> to demand a higher rate than generalists. Assembler is a specialty, and
> while there may not be a lot of demand, the ones who do require it will pay.
>
> I compare it to, for example, I have some classic vehicles with
> carburetors.   Not too many mechanics work on carburetors any more - but
> those who do have a lot of work.   Fine craftsmen may not be in huge
> demand due to the 'production line' manufacturing of most furniture -
> but those who do it make good money and have plenty of work.    People
> who specialize in repairing antique clocks, pottery, rugs, etc. may not
> be able to get a job anywhere - but if they are good at it, they have
> plenty of business.
>
> As long as the mainframe runs legacy code, there will be a need for
> assembler programmers.   That's my opinion, at least.
>
> On 9/13/2023 8:52 AM, Bob Bridges wrote:
> > I've long observed that no matter what your employer hired you for, what 
> > you turn out to be good at is what they use you for.  At one location I was 
> > the only one who bothered to figure out what was wrong with the big 
> > greenbar printer when it went haywire; before I left, therefore, I was the 
> > one folks came to when it misbehaved, and I was the one ordering supplies 
> > for it.  At another place my boss remarked, during an annual review, that 
> > "we gotta get you on some of these team projects; we keep using you as the 
> > lone fire-fighter for odd problems, but team projects will look good an 
> > your resume".  I nodded enthusiastically and agreed aloud, but the fact is 
> > I ~liked~ being the guy in the corner who did the odd jobs, figuring out 
> > the software that no one else had time for.
> >
> > I always recommend to young folks that they keep on doing what they're 
> > interested in doing.  Obviously this doesn't mean neglecting assigned tasks 
> > that sound boring; if I don't do what my boss wants me to do then I'm 
> > useless to him.  But eventually he'll discover that he wants me to do some 
> > of the things I'm especially good at too.
> >
> > ---
> > Bob Bridges, [email protected], cell 336 382-7313
> >
> > /* The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a 
> > little way past them into the impossible.  -[Arthur C] Clarke's 2nd law. */
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
> > Arthur Fichtl
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 04:18
> >
> > As a now retired freelance z/OS guy  based in Munich/Germany I had to find 
> > a market niche at my employer. Therefore I specialized on debugging, 
> > analysis of dumps and the like. For those tasks HLASM was inevitable.
> >
> > My colleagues preferred more comfortable tasks and languages and therefore 
> > I for myself had a quite secure job.
> >
> > And I liked it. My 1st language was the Siemens 4004 Assembler with punch 
> > cards as the user interface. Quite funny.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to