We’ve got loads of potential positions for good HLASM programmers. Send me your 
resume if you’re interested. 

> On 14 Sep 2023, at 4:23 am, Dean Kent <drke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I didn't want to get into the firefight... however, the commentary here 
> encouraged me to do so.
> 
> My own belief (whether founded or not) is that if you follow your passion and 
> become good at it, someone will recognize that and feel it is valuable enough 
> to pay for it.   I also believe that specialists tend to demand a higher rate 
> than generalists. Assembler is a specialty, and while there may not be a lot 
> of demand, the ones who do require it will pay.
> 
> I compare it to, for example, I have some classic vehicles with carburetors.  
>  Not too many mechanics work on carburetors any more - but those who do have 
> a lot of work.   Fine craftsmen may not be in huge demand due to the 
> 'production line' manufacturing of most furniture - but those who do it make 
> good money and have plenty of work.    People who specialize in repairing 
> antique clocks, pottery, rugs, etc. may not be able to get a job anywhere - 
> but if they are good at it, they have plenty of business.
> 
> As long as the mainframe runs legacy code, there will be a need for assembler 
> programmers.   That's my opinion, at least.
> 
> On 9/13/2023 8:52 AM, Bob Bridges wrote:
>> I've long observed that no matter what your employer hired you for, what you 
>> turn out to be good at is what they use you for.  At one location I was the 
>> only one who bothered to figure out what was wrong with the big greenbar 
>> printer when it went haywire; before I left, therefore, I was the one folks 
>> came to when it misbehaved, and I was the one ordering supplies for it.  At 
>> another place my boss remarked, during an annual review, that "we gotta get 
>> you on some of these team projects; we keep using you as the lone 
>> fire-fighter for odd problems, but team projects will look good an your 
>> resume".  I nodded enthusiastically and agreed aloud, but the fact is I 
>> ~liked~ being the guy in the corner who did the odd jobs, figuring out the 
>> software that no one else had time for.
>> 
>> I always recommend to young folks that they keep on doing what they're 
>> interested in doing.  Obviously this doesn't mean neglecting assigned tasks 
>> that sound boring; if I don't do what my boss wants me to do then I'm 
>> useless to him.  But eventually he'll discover that he wants me to do some 
>> of the things I'm especially good at too.
>> 
>> ---
>> Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
>> 
>> /* The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a 
>> little way past them into the impossible.  -[Arthur C] Clarke's 2nd law. */
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
>> Arthur Fichtl
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 04:18
>> 
>> As a now retired freelance z/OS guy  based in Munich/Germany I had to find a 
>> market niche at my employer. Therefore I specialized on debugging, analysis 
>> of dumps and the like. For those tasks HLASM was inevitable.
>> 
>> My colleagues preferred more comfortable tasks and languages and therefore I 
>> for myself had a quite secure job.
>> 
>> And I liked it. My 1st language was the Siemens 4004 Assembler with punch 
>> cards as the user interface. Quite funny.
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to