On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:35:45 +0000, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote:

> As this related to a purported need to link with AC=1,
> I was perfectly sure that that was not correct. And I remain so.

Is it truly a coincidence that this group failed in 1 week to solve a simple 
SCHEDIRB and LOAD failing when shortly after my first attempt, the op solved 
his problem? The OP sent his source and the op said it failed on LOAD. 

If this were not TSO involving LOAD, Peter might be correct. TSO does not 
follow conventional wisdom and rules. As a product developer, we had a LOAD 
fail in our product where (if I remember correctly) the solution was to link 
the module AC=1. Our product address space included multi-tasking TSO 
(concurrent TSO commands). Most people don't experience the quirks of TSO and 
would be surprised to learn that TSO changes many of the rules. For instance, I 
am painfully aware of JSCBAUTH because there are times it must be restored in 
TSO. Unix dubbing is also a problem.  

I bring this up because clueless Crayford is now saying "you're confused AGAIN" 
which I find offensive. Clearly I was not confused in my response to his 
comments. Clearly I'm not confused here although it's possible I'm wrong about 
TSO AC=1. When exactly am I repeatedly confused? I have a different life 
experience than most. Just because I don't respond does not mean I'm wrong. 
It's very rare for anyone to experience TSO quirks when there are only a couple 
of products running multi-tasking TSO in their product address space. There are 
few people with vast experience in a single diverse address space where many 
products are executing concurrently. Why should I continue a discussion that is 
irrelevant for most people and not beneficial to me?

Why do people consider me confused when I make completely relevant 
recommendations that many do not understand. This is my style of problem 
solving and it clearly works.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to