Hello
Right now the picture of CSA is good with just 9 percent used but I can see
ESQA is in overflowing condition
Area Start End Size(K) %Use Overflow
Size(Mb)
Extended Private 1B100000 7FFFFFFF 1653760K
1615Mb
Extended CSA 08B8E000 1B0FFFFF 300488K 49
293Mb
Extended MLPA -------- --------
0K
Extended FLPA 08B8B000 08B8DFFF
12K
Extended PLPA 034B6000 08B8AFFF 88916K
87Mb
Extended SQA 01DBD000 034B5FFF 23524K 97 1572K
23Mb
Extended R/W Nuc 01D6F000 01DBCFFF
312K
Extended R/O Nuc 01000000 01D6E4FF 13753K
13Mb
R/O Nuc 00FDD000 00FFFFFF
140K
R/W Nuc 00FD4000 00FDCAB7
34K
SQA 00E00000 00FD3FFF 1872K 29 0K
2Mb
PLPA 00C3D000 00DFFFFF 1804K
2Mb
FLPA 00C3C000 00C3CFFF
4K
MLPA -------- --------
0K
CSA 00A00000 00C3BFFF 2288K 9
2Mb
Private 00006000 009FFFFF 10216K
10Mb
V=R 00006000 00015FFF
64K
System 00002000 00005FFF
16K
PSA 00000000 00001FFF
8K
Home Address Space Length Used
Free
Region Requested
2000000K
Region Above 16M 1653760K 4400K
1649360K
Region Below 16M 10216K 1364K
8852K
DIAGxx
Option
CSA Tracking Active
SQA Tracking
Active
GFS Trace Inactive
On Sun, Nov 26, 2023, 9:35 PM Paul Feller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Peter, I've also have taken the attitude that SQA or ESQA overflow is not
> necessarily a bad thing as long as you are not running short of CSA or
> ECSA. As Martin mentioned you don't want to run out of CSA/ECSA.
>
> There are a few things that I've done over the years.
>
> There is a set of IRA messages that you could look for in the SYSLOG to
> get an idea of the data/time of when the overflow happens. There is also
> an IRA message that indicates when the overflow is relieved.
>
> Another thing I looked at was who was using up the SQA/ESQA. Did
> something "new" show up that is allocating SQA/ESQA. As a side note I
> would look at what the new thing might also be doing to the CSA/ECSA.
>
> As Martin mentioned the SMF type 78 record can be helpful. I had some SAS
> code I ran that looked at the SMF type 78 records to get a picture of the
> ups and downs of SQA/ESQA and CSA/ECSA usage. I'm not very good at coding
> SAS but I'm able to make things work. I got the original code off the CBT
> website and modified it for my needs. Unfortunately, I don't have access
> to the z/OS system anymore because I'm retired so I don't have any
> additional details I can give you around the SAS code.
>
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf
> Of Martin Packer
> Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2023 2:39 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: SQA overflow condition
>
> (This is not specific advice but a way of thinking about things.)
>
> SQA can, of course, overflow into CSA - with no real harm done. Unless it
> causes CSA to go short. (CSA can't overflow into SQA, of course.)
>
> The above statements are true for both 24-bit and 31-bit.
>
> 1409K below the line, though, is pretty extreme - for 24 bit. If you made
> SQA larger so that it only overflowed, say, by 100K there would be no
> wasted virtual storage.
>
> More importantly, check out the "free CSA" picture. You really don't want
> to run out of that. For 24-bit you want a few hundred K free. (But to
> achieve that might require losing 1MB of 24-bit private, which might not be
> consequence free.)
>
> For 31 bit I like to see at least 100MB free ECSA, preferably more. The
> reason is because ECSA is - in my experience - more volatile.
>
> Speaking of volatility, you need to plan defensively - as a problem can
> lead to surge in SQA and CSA usage .
>
> Final point: I would advocate using SMF 78-2 to build a picture of common
> storage usage - and how variable it is. Here is a blog post I wrote on the
> matter:
>
> htt ps://
> mainframeperformancetopics.com/2020/01/05/how-i-look-at-virtual-storage
>
> (Take out the space to follow the URL - as my mail client turned it into
> an attachment.) 😕
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On 26 Nov 2023, at 05:40, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I am able to see the below alert condition under RMF postprocessor III
> >
> >
> >
> > Name Reason Critical val. Possible cause or action
> >
> > *STOR TSQAO > 0 1409K bytes SQA overflow into CSA 1409K.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Our SQA and CSA set up in our IEASYSxx is as below
> >
> >
> >
> > CSA=(2000,300000)
> >
> >
> >
> > SQA=(16,192)
> >
> >
> > Hardware: z14
> > LPAR : 16gb memory
> > zOS 2.4
> >
> > Do I have think about tunning the SQA parameter ?
> >
> > Regards
> > Peter
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> Unless otherwise stated above:
>
> IBM United Kingdom Limited
> Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: PO
> Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
