This all looks healthy – to me. It’s a single point in time, of course.
Cheers, Martin From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Peter <dbajava...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, 27 November 2023 at 04:42 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: SQA overflow condition Hello Right now the picture of CSA is good with just 9 percent used but I can see ESQA is in overflowing condition Area Start End Size(K) %Use Overflow Size(Mb) Extended Private 1B100000 7FFFFFFF 1653760K 1615Mb Extended CSA 08B8E000 1B0FFFFF 300488K 49 293Mb Extended MLPA -------- -------- 0K Extended FLPA 08B8B000 08B8DFFF 12K Extended PLPA 034B6000 08B8AFFF 88916K 87Mb Extended SQA 01DBD000 034B5FFF 23524K 97 1572K 23Mb Extended R/W Nuc 01D6F000 01DBCFFF 312K Extended R/O Nuc 01000000 01D6E4FF 13753K 13Mb R/O Nuc 00FDD000 00FFFFFF 140K R/W Nuc 00FD4000 00FDCAB7 34K SQA 00E00000 00FD3FFF 1872K 29 0K 2Mb PLPA 00C3D000 00DFFFFF 1804K 2Mb FLPA 00C3C000 00C3CFFF 4K MLPA -------- -------- 0K CSA 00A00000 00C3BFFF 2288K 9 2Mb Private 00006000 009FFFFF 10216K 10Mb V=R 00006000 00015FFF 64K System 00002000 00005FFF 16K PSA 00000000 00001FFF 8K Home Address Space Length Used Free Region Requested 2000000K Region Above 16M 1653760K 4400K 1649360K Region Below 16M 10216K 1364K 8852K DIAGxx Option CSA Tracking Active SQA Tracking Active GFS Trace Inactive On Sun, Nov 26, 2023, 9:35 PM Paul Feller <prjfeller1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter, I've also have taken the attitude that SQA or ESQA overflow is not > necessarily a bad thing as long as you are not running short of CSA or > ECSA. As Martin mentioned you don't want to run out of CSA/ECSA. > > There are a few things that I've done over the years. > > There is a set of IRA messages that you could look for in the SYSLOG to > get an idea of the data/time of when the overflow happens. There is also > an IRA message that indicates when the overflow is relieved. > > Another thing I looked at was who was using up the SQA/ESQA. Did > something "new" show up that is allocating SQA/ESQA. As a side note I > would look at what the new thing might also be doing to the CSA/ECSA. > > As Martin mentioned the SMF type 78 record can be helpful. I had some SAS > code I ran that looked at the SMF type 78 records to get a picture of the > ups and downs of SQA/ESQA and CSA/ECSA usage. I'm not very good at coding > SAS but I'm able to make things work. I got the original code off the CBT > website and modified it for my needs. Unfortunately, I don't have access > to the z/OS system anymore because I'm retired so I don't have any > additional details I can give you around the SAS code. > > Paul > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf > Of Martin Packer > Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2023 2:39 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: SQA overflow condition > > (This is not specific advice but a way of thinking about things.) > > SQA can, of course, overflow into CSA - with no real harm done. Unless it > causes CSA to go short. (CSA can't overflow into SQA, of course.) > > The above statements are true for both 24-bit and 31-bit. > > 1409K below the line, though, is pretty extreme - for 24 bit. If you made > SQA larger so that it only overflowed, say, by 100K there would be no > wasted virtual storage. > > More importantly, check out the "free CSA" picture. You really don't want > to run out of that. For 24-bit you want a few hundred K free. (But to > achieve that might require losing 1MB of 24-bit private, which might not be > consequence free.) > > For 31 bit I like to see at least 100MB free ECSA, preferably more. The > reason is because ECSA is - in my experience - more volatile. > > Speaking of volatility, you need to plan defensively - as a problem can > lead to surge in SQA and CSA usage . > > Final point: I would advocate using SMF 78-2 to build a picture of common > storage usage - and how variable it is. Here is a blog post I wrote on the > matter: > > htt ps:// > mainframeperformancetopics.com/2020/01/05/how-i-look-at-virtual-storage > > (Take out the space to follow the URL - as my mail client turned it into > an attachment.) 😕 > > Cheers, Martin > > Sent from my iPad > > > On 26 Nov 2023, at 05:40, Peter <dbajava...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > I am able to see the below alert condition under RMF postprocessor III > > > > > > > > Name Reason Critical val. Possible cause or action > > > > *STOR TSQAO > 0 1409K bytes SQA overflow into CSA 1409K. > > > > > > > > > > > > Our SQA and CSA set up in our IEASYSxx is as below > > > > > > > > CSA=(2000,300000) > > > > > > > > SQA=(16,192) > > > > > > Hardware: z14 > > LPAR : 16gb memory > > zOS 2.4 > > > > Do I have think about tunning the SQA parameter ? > > > > Regards > > Peter > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > Unless otherwise stated above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: PO > Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless otherwise stated above: IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN