We need a better union. Maybe Fran Drescher is available. Actors have better terms. Former Nanny's apparently can get them.

We need better terms.

Doug Fuerst


------ Original Message ------
From "Mike Schwab" <mike.a.sch...@gmail.com>
To IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date 12/2/2023 16:11:33 PM
Subject Re: Assembler programmer wanted

If you wrote it while employed or under hourly contract its a work for hire
and company owns.  If paid for a finish product or during off duty time you
have the copyright and resellable, but strongly suggested to incle the
copyright assignment in the sales contract.

On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 2:37 PM Doug Fuerst <d...@bkassociates.net> wrote:

 Maybe we should ask for residuals for our creative property like actors.
 We give it all away too easily.

 What would happen if we all went on strike?

 Interesting thought....

 Doug Fuerst


 ------ Original Message ------
 From "Bob Bridges" <robhbrid...@gmail.com>
 To IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Date 12/2/2023 15:30:51 PM
 Subject Re: Assembler programmer wanted

 >Can't speak for anyone else, but I usually just take (or turn down) the
 first offer, mostly I think out of poor self-image.  Not sure why, because
 I don't mind dickering over a car.
 >
 >The only exception I can remember off-hand is when a consulting company
 that employed me was looking to cut costs, and asked that I go independent
 and start invoicing them rather than being a W-2.  They offered me the same
 rate I'd been making as an employee, which wasn't going to work for me if
 they stopped paying me for bench time.  But mostly I say "$65/hr?  Yeah, I
 can do that".  Shameful, I know.
 >
 >This, by the way, is one of those differences I had in mind when I said
 Yankee and Indian recruiters approach the negotiation differently.
 American companies have a definite range in mind and aren't usually shy
 about stating it in the opening email.  (Although I wouldn't be surprised
 if they give the lower part of the range, knowing they can raise it if they
 run across a really attractive candidate.)  Indian companies don’t usually
 state the range up front; instead I see "please send us your resume and
 your lowest rate...".  Different assumptions about the way the process
 should work, I suppose.
 >
 >---
 >Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
 >
 >/* The cure for boredom is curiosity.  There is no cure for curiosity.
 -Dorothy Parker */
 >
 >-----Original Message-----
 >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf
 Of Seymour J Metz
 >Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 13:05
 >
 >How many programmers negotiate when a recruiter contacts them with a
 lowball offer, and how many just move it to the circular file? When I'm
 looking for people, I don't want to scare away good candidates with an
 offer that might offend them; I ask "What are you looking for?".
 >
 >________________________________________
 >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf
 of Bob Bridges <robhbrid...@gmail.com>
 >Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 12:01 AM
 >
 >....On the other hand maybe it's just a negotiating tactic.  There are
 several differences in the way Indian and Yankee recruiters approach me
 (and I assume everyone else too); maybe lowballing is just one of the ways
 they're used to doing business, with the assumption that they'll have to go
 higher to actually close the deal.
 >
 >...$125/hr, really?  I should maybe pay more attention to the advice a
 fellow contractor gave me a couple decades ago.  I was working for ...
 well, apparently you would regard it as peanuts although it's always been
 adequate for me.  But Joe said I should demand $250/hr.  I'd work only
 about a third of the time, but since that's about three times what I
 typically was getting, it would come out even - and in the slack periods I
 could work on some saleable project.  I understood what he was saying; I
 just couldn't find a way to say "$250/hr" with a straight face.
 >
 >Maybe that's a common foible.  My ex made really high-end decorated
 cakes, the sort that we saw going for $150 and up at state fairs; but she
 couldn't bring herself to ask more for her work than the cost of
 materials.  She just couldn't believe her work was worth it.
 >
 >-----Original Message-----
 >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf
 Of Tony Harminc
 >Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 17:37
 >
 >I interpreted Bob's comment "...I think the rate is unusual; I'm guessing
 they don't think they can get one of their regulars to do it."  as meaning
 he thought it (60-65 $/hr) was high.
 >
 >But I agree that finding someone with serious assembler chops for that
 price isn't going to be easy. $65/hour sounds much more like an all-in
 employee-with-benefits kind of rate back-calculated from a salary.
 >
 >-----Original Message-----
 >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf
 Of Farley, Peter
 >Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 16:31
 >
 >Agreed, very low.  I asked for and received $125/hr back in 1999 for a
 complex assembler consulting job (BTAM / BDAM / multitasking / etc).   With
 inflation and time passing the starting rate for that kind of work has to
 go over $200/hr at the very least to attract anyone with the talent and
 experience.
 >
 >If it is a truly junior position though, say maintaining and perhaps
 documenting old single-function utility ASM subroutines, that might not be
 a terrible starting point to negotiate upwards.  Anything more complicated
 than that, start the negotiation higher, or much higher depending on the
 actual work to be done.
 >
 >-----Original Message-----
 >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf
 Of Mike Shaw
 >Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 16:15
 >
 >Gotta be low...
 >
 >-----Original Message-----
 >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf
 Of Gord Tomlin
 >Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 15:24
 >
 >--- On 2023-12-01 14:14 PM, Bob Bridges wrote:
 >Pure curiosity: unusually low or unusually high?
 >
 >-----Original Message-----
 >From: robhbrid...@gmail.com <robhbrid...@gmail.com>
 >Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 14:14
 >
 >I have a req here from Enterprise solutions for an assembler programmer,
 paying "60-65 $/hr" on corp-to-corp.  Anyone wanted a copy, let me know and
 I'll pass it on.
 >
 >I've never done business with this recruiter but I think the rate is
 unusual; I'm guessing they don't think they can get one of their regulars
 to do it.
 >
 >----------------------------------------------------------------------
 >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
 email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 >
 >
 >----------------------------------------------------------------------
 >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
 email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 >
 >----------------------------------------------------------------------
 >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 >send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to