W dniu 23.06.2024 o 10:51, Mike Cairns pisze:
No Bob - I meant UACC(READ) or its equivalent. I just don't see what gate is being closed by insisting that LinkList or LPA libraries must have UACC(NONE), when, as you confirm, they cannot be fetch protected and therefore the content is available to anyone on the system anyway.
I met the following justification: when you have UACC(NONE) for linklisted library then you enforce use LNKLST instead of STEPLIB/JOBLIB. While I understand the above, I don't agree with the goal as being worth such configuration.
And there is another approach: UACC above NONE should not be used at all. Just because mama (auditor) said so.
-- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
