We did UACC(WARN) and monitored to make sure somebody put RACF on it. We eventually went to NONE.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 7:16 AM Radoslaw Skorupka <[email protected]> wrote: > > W dniu 23.06.2024 o 10:51, Mike Cairns pisze: > > No Bob - I meant UACC(READ) or its equivalent. I just don't see what gate > > is being closed by insisting that LinkList or LPA libraries must have > > UACC(NONE), when, as you confirm, they cannot be fetch protected and > > therefore the content is available to anyone on the system anyway. > > I met the following justification: when you have UACC(NONE) for > linklisted library then you enforce use LNKLST instead of STEPLIB/JOBLIB. > While I understand the above, I don't agree with the goal as being worth > such configuration. > > And there is another approach: UACC above NONE should not be used at > all. Just because mama (auditor) said so. > > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
