I agree with you. I had to get some code going then.
On Sun, 25 May 2025, 10:03 pm Seymour J Metz, <[email protected]> wrote: > None. My recollection is that SWA above the line came in with MVS/SP V2 > (MVS/XA) R2 - MVS/SP V3 (MVS/ESA) at the latest. Long before OS/390 and > z/OS. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי > נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר > > > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf > of Steff Gladstone <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2025 6:09 AM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: SWAREQ > > > External Message: Use Caution > > > A couple of questions: > > 1. At which release of z/OS did IBM move the JCT above the 16M line and > initiate the use of SVA's? We have a couple of installations at > earlier releases and we want to make sure that the SWAREQ macro won't fail > there. > > 2. The macro IEFZB505 has two options for the keyword parameter LOCEPAX in > unauthorized mode: "YES" and "VR2". When should either be used? > > Thanks, > Steff Gladstone > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
