It's fine to be skeptical. The question is - will one take an effort at this stage to find out the facts, or just propagate that hunch in place of an informed... "decision".
On Monday, June 23rd, 2025 at 10:27, Jon Perryman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 02:16:06 +0000, kekronbekron [email protected] > wrote: > > > NO, it's not like Go. > > Rust's unsafe is explicit, unlike Go. It allows low-level control with > > clear risk flags, > > > I don't know Rust but controlling unsafe activities with risk flags implies > that statements without risk flags are always safe. I'm skeptical of that > statement. > > GO could not make that guarantee because that compromised data can be used by > other statements. Any module that imports "unsafe" must be considered an > unsafe module despite many activities are safe. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
