No, actually we do not. I deliberately used the IBM supplied PROC to ensure the widest possible audience.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 5:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Announcing PCRE 8.33 for native z/OS Ah! So I didn't imagine it after all! :-) Does your shop really use the IBM supplied compile procs? Interesting... >________________________________ > From: "Farley, Peter x23353" <peter.far...@broadridge.com> >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Sent: Friday, July 5, 2013 10:21 AM >Subject: Re: Announcing PCRE 8.33 for native z/OS > >I did try a dynamic call version, with DYNAM compile option with both static >program names in the CALL statements and also with initialized program name >variables in the CALL statements, and like Frank S. I got S0C1's or S806 >abends at execution time even with SCEELKED/RUN/RUN2 in the STEPLIB for the >execution step, so dynamic call of these C runtime routines is apparently not >possible, one must use NODYNAM static CALL's and link them into the load >module. > >HTH > >Peter -- This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
