I could agree with that too. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 9:02 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMF record - IPADDR
In <003801ce8119$55b87300$01295900$@com>, on 07/15/2013 at 12:08 AM, "Roger W. Suhr" <[email protected]> said: >I'd vote for both. All IBM product SMF records type 0-200 should be >documented in the SMF manual. Alternatively, the SMF and control blocks manuals should have links[1] to the appropriate product manuals. [1] In a usable form, e.g., a PDF should allow copying or selecting the URL. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
