In
<cae1xxdgyyohtcvjaskqu_tjjcw6s8imk8gc5uwdx+mohaea...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 07/18/2013
at 03:24 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> said:
>I avoided discussion of VDL, lazily perhaps; but it is not really
>accessible without a great deal of work unless one knows recursive
>function theory well.
I found it quite readable; certainly easier that the ALGOL 68 report.
It's not "Dick and Jane", but it was easier getting definitive answers
out of it than out of specifications written in vague prose.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
