If I'm doing UNIX only work, I use Co:Z. But if I need to intermix TSO and UNIX, then I use the TMP and OSHELL. And I often use OSHELL examples here simply because many shops are restricted from installing unapproved software. I am blessed in that I can install most anything so long as I don't spend money or introduce reliability issues.
I would love it if IBM would "adopt" Co:Z like it did your JZOS. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kirk Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > Only IBM would see the wisdom in running TSO in batch in order to run a > z/OS Unix shell :-) > > The rational way would be where the z/OS shell input was read its stdin > from a DD just like it works interactively: > > // EXEC PGM=?????? > //STDIN DD * > cp -p -R /usr/lpp/cics_test/utill/ \ > /usr/lpp/cics_prod/utill/ > // > > Kirk Wolf > Dovetailed Technologies > http://dovetail.com > > PS> Co:Z Batch is just a utility. It is part of the Co:Z Toolkit and is > free to use under our Community License; Enterprise License and Support > agreements are also available. > http://www.dovetail.com/products/cozbatch.html > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- As of next week, passwords will be entered in Morse code. Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
