On 20/08/2013, at 10:10 PM, John McKown <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I'm doing UNIX only work, I use Co:Z. But if I need to intermix TSO and > UNIX, then I use the TMP and OSHELL. And I often use OSHELL examples here > simply because many shops are restricted from installing unapproved > software. I am blessed in that I can install most anything so long as I > don't spend money or introduce reliability issues. > > I would love it if IBM would "adopt" Co:Z like it did your JZOS. > Me too! It's a joy to use. > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kirk Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Only IBM would see the wisdom in running TSO in batch in order to run a >> z/OS Unix shell :-) >> >> The rational way would be where the z/OS shell input was read its stdin >> from a DD just like it works interactively: >> >> // EXEC PGM=?????? >> //STDIN DD * >> cp -p -R /usr/lpp/cics_test/utill/ \ >> /usr/lpp/cics_prod/utill/ >> // >> >> Kirk Wolf >> Dovetailed Technologies >> http://dovetail.com >> >> PS> Co:Z Batch is just a utility. It is part of the Co:Z Toolkit and is >> free to use under our Community License; Enterprise License and Support >> agreements are also available. >> http://www.dovetail.com/products/cozbatch.html >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > As of next week, passwords will be entered in Morse code. > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
