In
<cae1xxdhzntyss_1w68jktuwrcqzy8uvvdaqeymfa6wzojpz...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 08/21/2013
at 10:21 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> said:
>In one shop, call it S to protect the guilty, the applications
>programmers were very reluctant, perhaps for sentimental reasons, to
>give up using it long after any rationale for doing so had
>disappeared. Making IEWL440 an alias for a more storage-intensive
>and much more efficient version of the linkage editor resolved this
>problem without discommoding the these sentimental S applications
>programmers.
>This is a wholly appropriate use of catalog aliases.
No, it has nothing to do with catalog alias entries.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
