Address space resource managers execute in asid 1, *MASTER*. Unless they
issue a message, you would never know they executed. If an ASCB RESMGR were
not cleaning up after itself, it would account for accumulations.

Kenneth   

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Memory For MSTJCL00 - Whose Is It?

General thoughts with no hard data behind them. I.E. SWAGs

1) MSTJCL00 (i.e. *MASTER*) has been flagged by WLM as Storage Critical.
Check w/WLM development.
2) Turn on the VSM* parameters in SYS1.PARMLIB(DIAG*) for data gathering.
View w/IPCS and/or RMF.
     Not sure what (if any) RSM* parameters are available.

I believe your theory about MSTJCL00 being used as an anchor is reasonable,
however, 2 GB of anchors seems excessive, even in a very large system. 
I do not believe this is a backing for anything that does not belong to a
"system address space".

FWIW,


<snip>
Almost a year ago in
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/MartinPacker/entry/bad_da
ta_and_the_subjunctive_mood?lang=en
I talked about seeing large numbers for memory in MSTJCL00.

At the time I got no takers as to what it could be. So I'm trying again
here...

... Is MSTJCL00 the anchor for something? Common Large Memory Objects
perhaps?

And are YOU seeing large memory numbers?
</snip>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to