Tom,

Here is my 2cents worth

Yes it is do-able.  However, here are the challenges

1) How many applications have unique LOADLIBs?
2) What STCs are those libraries tied to - DB2 Stored Procedures, MQ STC, DB2 
STC, CICS STC, IMS STC.
3) How many loadlibs need to be replicated from PDS to PDS/E?
4) How many users have used hardcoded libraries rather than using the supplied 
Libraries?  Mostly JCL not maintained by a source manager
5) What functions would require a cycle to implement the new loadlibs ahead of 
the the current ones?

As you are aware some shops will have jobs running that might not be controlled 
by a source manager (Change Man or Endevor, etc...) or scheduling software.

If you recall, IBM put in a fix to list VSAM files that had Replicate/Imbed 
created a Message to indicate what files had those attributes.  This will be a 
little more interesting.


Lizette


-----Original Message-----
>From: Tom Ross <[email protected]>
>Sent: Sep 23, 2013 12:17 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: PDS/E, Shared Dasd, and COBOL V5
>
>>If you set up new PDS/E program libraries for only V5 program code, then
>>any time maintenance on a COBOL program is done the maintainer must be
>>aware whether this is the first time this program has compiled with V5
>>and if so, be sure any related production JCL gets changed to reference
>>the new library in sync with the program installation and be sure the
>>obsolete load module in some PDS gets purged at the same time to prevent
>>possible execution of obsolete code.
>
>How about if shops start changing COBOL build processes today to use PDSE
>datasets for COBOL V4 (or COBOL 3) programs?
>Step 1 would be to allocate new PDSE datasets for each zone of load libraries
>Step 2 would be to add the new PDSE dataset(s) to load library concatenations
> where needed. If put first it would guarantee access to new programs.
>Step 3 would be to change build processes to link old COBOL programs into 
>PDSEs.
>Step 4 would be to make sure this works for all systems and that old 
>(unreachable)
> programs get deleted from PDS datasets
>Step 5 from time to time, move needed load modules from PDSs to PDSEs until 
>all are
> moved.
>Step 6 when all code has been moved, the only programs in PDS should be
> unused, and the PDS datasets could be deleted
>
>  If this plan was used, the COBOL V5 PDSE requirement would not be disruptive.
>My question, is it do-able?
>
>Cheers,
>TomR              >> COBOL is the Language of the Future! <<

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to