On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:47:24 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: > >Programmers like me would desperately love to see the new compiler in action >and get going on using the enhanced facilities -- but the procedural hurdles >that IBM has thrown up with this PDSE requirement are going to be staggeringly >expensive to cross over. > Actually, I don't believe program objects are required to reside in PDSEs, or does COBOL impose this as an additional requirement?
(Of course there's a drawback: program objects not in PDSes are not readily accessible to LOAD/LINK/ATTACH/XCTL facilities.) -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
