I had hoped I could resist contributing to this thread; alas,
apparently not.

On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:29:40 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:

>David,
>
>No.   I in fact regret the lingering influence of 17th-century
>puritanism on English usage.  In, say, Italian the cognate verb,
>pisciare, has always been usable even in what used to be called polite
>society.  Preoccupation with avoiding four-letter words in English has
>had very unfortunate effects.  The forced choice between sounding like
>a medical textbook or a guttersnipe in talking about the obvious
>topics is disagreeable.
> 
But I have a fairly clear recollection (but can't find in the archives here;
perhaps it was ASSEMBLER-LIST) of an instance where you chastised
a writer who failed to "bowdlerize" some content.

(Perhaps, but not exactly, ASSEMBLER-LIST, 2012-02-12, wherein
you elected to supply a "bowdlerized" translation from German.)

However, David was playing not on your puritanism, but on your
erudition, in my perception.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to