http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/09/nsa-backdoor/all/
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:37 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: > The the implications of the post by J.P. are entirely correct; but the > post itself is---I don't mean this pejoratively---a little naif. > > The NSA cannot be expected to advocate the use of an encryption scheme > that it has not already broken, and this behavior does not seem to me > to be villainous. Why should it act against its interests? We are > a long way from Henry Stimson's, "Gentlemen do not read each other's > mail"; and there is no going back.. > > John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
