On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:21:15 +0800, David Crayford wrote:

>I programmed in PL/I
>professionally and IMO Pascal is a far cleaner language with more
>expressive features. Pascals successors, such as Module/2 and Delphi,
>widen the gap even more.

I would never profess to have "programmed" in PL/I - I was taught it by a 
one-time employer. Did the job for a high level language in the 80's - but I 
was an assembler sysprog.
Now Delphi - that was something else again when I was looking to do some 
Windoze coding some years later. Man, that IDE was awesome, even for a 
non-Pascal guy.
Borland exes should have been shot for what they did to that business. There 
was a huge user conference in Anaheim in 1996 when I passed through in 1996. 
And they (Borland) tossed it all away.

Shane ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to