In <[email protected]>, on
10/01/2013
at 10:50 AM, "David G. Schlecht" <[email protected]> said:
>Forgive me if this is obvious to everyone but me, but I’m
>seeing a difference in the way name resolution (resolver) works on
>MVS and OMVS. In OMVS, a command line ping or dig or nslookup all
>correctly resolve a domain name. However, issuing the PING or
>NSLOOKUP command in TSO or PING in batch return unknown host errors.
A difference in name resolution almost certainly stems from a
difference in TCP parameters. Check what's in your batch JCL, your
logon proc and your Unix scripts.
There has been discussion on IBM-MAIN in the past on the priorities of
the various sources for TCP configuration data, and it's documented in
the CS manuals.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
