On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:22:59 +0100, Martin Packer <[email protected]> wrote:
>The discussion so far has been about SYSTEM-Managed Duplexing. What hasn't >been discussed is USER-Managed Duplexing. The latter (DB2 Group Buffer >Pools only so POSSIBLY not relevant to the Original Poster) generally sees >far fewer requests to the Secondary structure. > >Which is why customers are less leery of User-Managed Structure Duplexing >than System-Managed. > My swag didn't differentiate. But maybe Mark Books' post explained that? "if the application is doing a "read and delete" of an object, both CF's need to delete the object but only one of them needs to do the work to send back the data." But is that behavior different for system managed duplexing vs. user managed duplexing? Regards, Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:[email protected] ITIL v3 Foundation Certified Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://search390.techtarget.com/ateExperts/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
