Well. Agreed on the IBM Mainers.  Maybe if we banded together we could get one 
of those contracts.... I remember reading years ago a company had a contract to 
redo the IRS software and they wasted something like three or $4 billion and it 
never did work!  We could definitely do that. LOL!  If the government was in 
charge of Windows, we'd still be using typewriters :)

Duffy

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 15, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Kirk Wolf <[email protected]> wrote:

> David,
> 
> The referenced article only seems to talk about the front end "UX".  The
> CTO of HHS didn't even mention the back end (done by CGI Federal).
> Probably slipped his mind :-)
> 
> The entire system reported cost over 600 million USD (so far).   I would
> bet that I could put together a team of IBM-MAINers and build a system that
> works just as well for half as much ;-)
> 
> Kirk Wolf
> Dovetailed Technologies
> http://dovetail.com
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:58 PM, David Crayford <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 15/10/2013 4:21 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>> 
>>> How great to finally have government information systems built by
>>> hipsters....
>> 
>> Hardly hipsters. The project was outsourced to CGI Federal :). There are
>> certainly parallels here with gov.uk, but gov.uk has been a resounding
>> success.
>> It's a bit like one of those UK TV shows like Fawlty Towers that gets
>> remade in the US and fails miserably. However, gov.uk, like most sensible
>> startups,
>> had the good sense to use the elastic cloud. Once you know how much
>> capacity you need you can always bring it back in house.
>> 
>> It's so bad even the github repo page 404s.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> http://www.theatlantic.com/**technology/archive/2013/06/**
>>> healthcaregov-code-developed-**by-the-people-and-for-the-**
>>> people-released-back-to-the-**people/277295/<http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/06/healthcaregov-code-developed-by-the-people-and-for-the-people-released-back-to-the-people/277295/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A great quote from the article:
>>> 
>>> Jekyll, for those who are unfamiliar with web-development trends, is a way
>>> for developers to build a static website from dynamic components. Instead
>>> of running a traditional website with a relational database and
>>> server-side
>>> code, using Jekyll enables programmers to create content like they create
>>> code. The end result of this approach is a site that loads faster for
>>> users, a crucial performance issue, particularly on mobile devices.
>>> "Instead of [running] farms of application servers to handle massive load,
>>> you're basically slimming down to two," said Sivak. "You're just using
>>> HTML5, CSS, and Javascript, all being done in responsive design. The way
>>> it's being built matters. You could in theory do the same with application
>>> servers and a CMS, but it would be much more complex. What we're doing
>>> here
>>> is giving anyone with basic skills to basic changes on the fly. You don't
>>> need expensive consultants."
>>> 
>>> To be fair, the major problems reportedly are not with the UI, but with
>>> the
>>> back end.   IMO, an example of "pig lipstick".
>>> 
>>> PS> For extra laughs, read some of the comments.
>> 
>> For an extra giggle 
>> http://www.reddit.com/r/**webdev/comments/1nj692/<http://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/1nj692/>
>> .
>> 
>> 
>>> Kirk Wolf
>>> Dovetailed Technologies
>>> http://dovetail.com
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>> ----------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**----------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to