On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:11:46 -0500, John Gilmore wrote: >Why the magic number of 123 extents per volume? 127 is more >plausible. What else is going on here? > Isn't this somewhat akin to my ranting in the past about why the maximum BLKSIZE is 32760 when 32767 is more plausible?
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
