On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:35:19 -0500, Peter Relson wrote: > >Having said that, we are considering a convention under which symbol >values can be longer than the symbol name, with the user's understanding >that any truncation that results may be ignored. > I would much favor a convention that reports the truncation as an error. Then it's up to the caller to handle or ignore it.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
