In <[email protected]>, on 03/08/2014
at 09:55 PM, "Joel C. Ewing" <[email protected]> said:
>I believe the CP-40 and CP-67 precursors of VM/370 required more than
>just S/360 architecture;
For CP-40 the extension was nonstandard, but for CP-67 the extension
was part of a standard 360/67, even though it was not part of the
S/360 architecture. There's a 360/67 functional specifications on
bitsavers that describes the non-architected features.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
