On 25 March 2014 19:03, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Well you can't reasonably ask for trilingual macros and then shrug > >your shoulders when asked for how it might work. > > > Actually, I can. That's an implementation technique. Suppose a > Requirement for trilingual macros were to be submitted to IBM. > It's my understanding that when considering Requirements, IBM > discourages the users' specifying implementation techniques, > desiring only objectives instead.
Sigh. By the same token asking for trilingual macros is an implementation technique. What is the business problem you want IBM to address? Perhaps shipping mappings for all three languages, with identical names and such? Then maybe IBM can decide if a trilingual approach is the best fit. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
