In <3653742774909972.wa.paulgboulderaim....@listserv.ua.edu>, on 03/25/2014 at 06:03 PM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> said:
>Actually, I can. That's an implementation technique. Suppose a >Requirement for trilingual macros were to be submitted to IBM. They'd reject it. >It's my understanding that when considering Requirements, IBM >discourages the users' specifying implementation techniques, >desiring only objectives instead. And yet you're asking for a specific implementation technique instead of the actual objective, which is to have control block mappings for multiple languages. It might be nice that a single file serve all of the languages, but that should not be part of the requirement. BTW, why trilingual? Why not multilingual, to include at least foo, bar and baz? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN