> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:40:50 +0000, Chase, John wrote: > >> > >> Don't blame ISPF. The critical thing is DISP=OLD allocation occurring > >> after a DISP=SHR. > > > >Right; that part we understand. We've also learned from our scheduler > >vendor that it attempts to > obtain exclusive control of the library MEMBER, rather than the whole > library, ... > > > Just curious: Does it use the ISPF-style ENQ?
We didn't get that level of detail in the vendor's reply, but that would seem to be the most logical choice. -jc- ********************************************************************** Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments thereto is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the sender immediately, and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of its content to any other person. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
