On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:40:50 +0000, Chase, John wrote: >> >> Don't blame ISPF. The critical thing is DISP=OLD allocation occurring >> after a DISP=SHR. > >Right; that part we understand. We've also learned from our scheduler vendor >that it attempts to obtain exclusive control of the library MEMBER, rather >than the whole library, ... > Just curious: Does it use the ISPF-style ENQ?
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
