Specifically, program object is not equal to loadmodule when the containing dataset is a PDS.
> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Peter Relson > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 4:56 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: AMBLIST, AMASPZAP, and UNIX Program Objects > > >Is "load module" depending on context assumed to embrace "program > >object"? > > I'd say "yes". I doubt that anyone is going to go through all the books and > change "load module" to "load module or program object". One might say > that it was a poor decision to have made up a name just because something is > in a PDSE in part because of the lack of clarity it introduced in cases like > this. > Still, I think we're smart enough to deal with this without such updates. > > Perhaps "depending on context" is "in all cases". However, those with better > memories than I will probably think of cases where it is not true that "load > module" could be replaced by "load module or program object" > but none come to mind. The same could not be said of PDS vs PDSE. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
