We are z/OS V1.12 We are considering changing from a mix of Tape and Disk for HSM functions.
So ML2 would go away or be very reduced ML1 would be expanded BACKUP and ABARS would be directed to DASD. Has anyone done this? If so, what were some of the experiences? Did you find the increase in dasd requirements were exponential? Or were they an easy slope (that is not any quick growth) Did you find any issues with constantly adding dasd? Or could you stabilize the HSM needs. Did it provide better support for Business Recovery or Disaster Recovery? Any performance issues? Thanks for any input Lizette ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
