In <[email protected]>, on 09/05/2014
at 02:45 PM, Ed Gould <[email protected]> said:
>I guess we will have to disagree on what holds can be bypassed.
What he wrote was "You should never (unless told by IBM who probably
never will) BYPASS error holds." Dropping the word "error" changes
its meaning drastically.
>In summary I think its OK to bypass *SOME* hold errors
What do you mean by "hold errors"? The OP is referring to error holds,
and you have not given a case where it is advisable to bypass an error
hold. That has nothing to do with bypassing, e.g., DOC.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
