I think I found the root cause of this issue.

During z/OS 2.1 installtion SYS1.SCEELKED was overwritten by SYS1.SEDCBASE
on RES001 because the DDDEF entry references it -

REP DDDEF(*SEDCBASE*)
          DA(Z21.SYS1.*SCEELKED*)
          SHR .

When I compared with my old z/OS 1.13 system

Data Set Name  . . . : SYS1.SCEELKED
Volume serial . . . : RES1301
Number of members . : *10,640*

Data Set Name  . . . : SYS1.SCEELKED
Volume serial . . . : RES001
Number of members . : *11,017*

Data Set Name  . . . : SYS1.SEDCBASE
Volume serial . . . : RES1301
Number of members . : *751*

Data Set Name  . . . : SYS1.SEDCBASE
Volume serial . . . : RES001
Number of members . : *0*

*So, my SYS1.*SEDCBASE is empty and SYS1.SCEELKED is with unwanted data.

Now, the question is, how can I correct this mistake rather then installing
z/OS 2.1 from scratch.

 By mistake these two libraries are messed up now.  FMID HCLB201
belong to C/370
LIBRARY, which we recently installed.
To isolate this issue, I am planning to restore C/370 with having DDDEF(
*SEDCBASE*) pointed to SYS1.*SCEELKED*(ZS21T1).
This should remove all data populated during last apply and should clean
SYS1.

*SCEELKED.  *But the issue is,If we restore SCEELKED from initial tape then
it will reach to initial state and we applied many other FMID and installed
CICS after that.

So, all will be affected. I am working out to find to alternate solution .


On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> In <[email protected]>, on 09/05/2014
>    at 02:45 PM, Ed Gould <[email protected]> said:
>
> >I guess we will have to disagree on what holds can be bypassed.
>
> What he wrote was "You should never (unless told by IBM who probably
> never will)   BYPASS error holds." Dropping the word "error" changes
> its meaning drastically.
>
> >In summary I think its OK to bypass *SOME* hold errors
>
> What do you mean by "hold errors"? The OP is referring to error holds,
> and you have not given a case where it is advisable to bypass an error
> hold. That has nothing to do with bypassing, e.g., DOC.
>
> --
>      Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
>      ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
> (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to