Not that I'm aware of. The only difference is that the batch job "uses
up" an initiator. But once it is running, no real differences. Unless
the STC is running a program which is in the PPT as having special
properties, such as running non-key 8.

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Neil E. Ervin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Are there any performance or cpu consumption benefits to converting never 
> ending batch jobs to started tasks?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Neil E. Ervin
>
> Mainframe Performance Analyst
> Mainframe/Midrange Services
>
> Wells Fargo Compute Platform Services  l  North Carolina (Eastern Time Zone)
> MAC D1112-023
> Cell 910-477-2536 l  Text Pager: 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> TOG 
> Recognition<http://teamworks.portal.wellsfargo.com/portal/site/teamworks/menuitem.bc20064d3988cfc006d0c110cd2db1a0/?vgnextoid=e14ce1890b6af010VgnVCM1000008c321b0aRCRD>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
There is nothing more pleasant than traveling and meeting new people!
Genghis Khan

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to