Not that I'm aware of. The only difference is that the batch job "uses up" an initiator. But once it is running, no real differences. Unless the STC is running a program which is in the PPT as having special properties, such as running non-key 8.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Neil E. Ervin <[email protected]> wrote: > Are there any performance or cpu consumption benefits to converting never > ending batch jobs to started tasks? > > Thanks, > > > > Neil E. Ervin > > Mainframe Performance Analyst > Mainframe/Midrange Services > > Wells Fargo Compute Platform Services l North Carolina (Eastern Time Zone) > MAC D1112-023 > Cell 910-477-2536 l Text Pager: > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > TOG > Recognition<http://teamworks.portal.wellsfargo.com/portal/site/teamworks/menuitem.bc20064d3988cfc006d0c110cd2db1a0/?vgnextoid=e14ce1890b6af010VgnVCM1000008c321b0aRCRD> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- There is nothing more pleasant than traveling and meeting new people! Genghis Khan Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
